Model failure · Brightwater Energy Corp 2028 (B) · CHF 2052 Notes · CDSBench #194 · benchmark v0.1
Claude abstained on a question the record answered
Question
Reconciling all documents in the record, is the instrument transferable without the consent of the Issuer?
- Verified answer
- Yes The Supplement deletes and replaces the original consent requirement.
- Claude answered
- Review The documents conflict on transferable; review required.
- Decisive issue
- Transferability
- Evidence for the label
- Claude cited
- evidence score 100%
Failure classification
Unnecessary review
- Unnecessary review. Abstained (REVIEW_REQUIRED) although the record supports a definite answer (YES).
Classifications are produced by the failure analyzer against the verified label and the evidence map; the model never grades itself. Failure taxonomy →
Everyone else
The same question, every other participant
- MastermindAbstainedanswered Reviewits failure page →
- GPTIncorrectanswered Noits failure page →
- GeminiCorrectanswered Yes
Related failures
Claude also missed at least 6 other transferability questions
- #16 Halvard Steel AG 2025Unnecessary review
- #36 Orinoco Retail Holdings plc 2027Unnecessary review
- #56 Brightwater Energy Corp 2024Unnecessary review
- #66 Republic of Sanderia 2025Unnecessary review
- #95 Northgate Shipping Ltd 2028Unnecessary review
- #134 Solvane Airlines S.A. 2027Unnecessary review
Benchmark version
v0.1
This page records Claude’s answer from its latest official run on the frozen benchmark v0.1. If the model is re-run and the answer changes, the page shows the new result and the model page keeps the full run history. Corrections policy →
Same kind of question on your own documents?
Mastermind runs the deterministic tests, the skeptic and the evidence verification on your record. Private documents never enter the benchmark.
Analyze your own documents →