Skip to content
CDSBench
Model failure · Calder Chemicals N.V. 2024 (B) · USD 2034 Notes · CDSBench #255 · benchmark v0.1

GPT answered No; the verified outcome was Yes

IncorrectEntity matchMulti documentdeterministically verifiedself-reported confidence 92%
Question

Is the issuer of the instrument the Reference Entity or a recognised successor of it according to the record?

Verified answer
Yes The DC notice records the Reference Entity as successor to the issuer.
GPT answered
No Issuer name differs; succession noted in the record.
Decisive issue
Entity match
Evidence for the label
GPT cited
evidence score 67%
Failure classification

Failed multi document reasoning

  • Failed multi document reasoning. Failed to reconcile documents (answered NO, verified YES).
  • Overconfident. Confidence 0.92 on an incorrect answer.

Classifications are produced by the failure analyzer against the verified label and the evidence map; the model never grades itself. Failure taxonomy →

Everyone else

The same question, every other participant

  • MastermindCorrectanswered Yes
  • ClaudeCorrectanswered Yes
  • GeminiCorrectanswered Yes

Open the full Case Replay with the documents →

Related failures

GPT also missed 1 other entity match question

Benchmark version

v0.1

This page records GPT’s answer from its latest official run on the frozen benchmark v0.1. If the model is re-run and the answer changes, the page shows the new result and the model page keeps the full run history. Corrections policy →

Same kind of question on your own documents?
Mastermind runs the deterministic tests, the skeptic and the evidence verification on your record. Private documents never enter the benchmark.
Analyze your own documents →
GPT on Calder Chemicals N.V. 2024 (B) · USD 2034 Notes — CDSBench #255 · CDSBench