Model failure · Federal Republic of Aurelia 2028 · CHF 2037 Notes · CDSBench #47 · benchmark v0.1
Mastermind reached the verified outcome but cited evidence that does not exist
Question
Applying the standard Deliverable Obligation Characteristics (Not Subordinated, Specified Currency, Not Contingent, Transferable, Maximum Maturity 30 years, Not Bearer), is the instrument a Deliverable Obligation for this credit event?
- Verified answer
- Ineligible A deliverable-obligation characteristic fails on the record.
- Mastermind answered
- Ineligible Deterministic rule failed: Transferable.
- Decisive issue
- Deliverability
- Evidence for the label
- Mastermind cited
- 1 non-existentevidence score 80%
Failure classification
Hallucinated evidence
- Hallucinated evidence. 1 cited section id(s) do not exist in the case record.
Classifications are produced by the failure analyzer against the verified label and the evidence map; the model never grades itself. Failure taxonomy →
Everyone else
The same question, every other participant
- ClaudeCorrectanswered Ineligibleits failure page →
- GPTCorrectanswered Ineligibleits failure page →
- GeminiCorrectanswered Ineligibleits failure page →
Related failures
Mastermind also missed 5 other deliverability questions
- #57 Brightwater Energy Corp 2024Unnecessary review
- #96 Northgate Shipping Ltd 2028Hallucinated evidence
- #116 Calder Chemicals N.V. 2025Unnecessary review
- #195 Brightwater Energy Corp 2028 (B)Unnecessary review
- #283 Republic of Norland 2027 (C)Unnecessary review
Benchmark version
v0.1
This page records Mastermind’s answer from its latest official run on the frozen benchmark v0.1. If the model is re-run and the answer changes, the page shows the new result and the model page keeps the full run history. Corrections policy →
Same kind of question on your own documents?
Mastermind runs the deterministic tests, the skeptic and the evidence verification on your record. Private documents never enter the benchmark.
Analyze your own documents →